Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/spera/www.worldsavvy.org/monitor/components/com_acctexp/acctexp.class.php on line 245
Migration: Why?

Human Migration

Issue 7, January 2009


Warning: Parameter 1 to modMainMenuHelper::buildXML() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/spera/www.worldsavvy.org/monitor/libraries/joomla/cache/handler/callback.php on line 99

Warning: Parameter 1 to modMainMenuHelper::buildXML() expected to be a reference, value given in /home/spera/www.worldsavvy.org/monitor/libraries/joomla/cache/handler/callback.php on line 99

Download This Issue


Human Migration Cover
(registration required)

Home Migration Basics Migration: Why?
Migration: Why? Print

Human migration is often explained in terms of “pushes” and “pulls.”  Pushes are the conditions in one’s country of origin that provide the motivation for leaving.  Pulls are the conditions in the Bangladeshi women survey the destruction of Cyclone Sidrcountry of destination that lure a migrant to leave home.  Pushes and pulls are related, and are often hard to distinguish.   

The decision to migrate is a complex one:  pushes and pulls can be economic, social, cultural, political and personal.  Moreover, migrants’ motives often change along the journey.

Migration’s pushes and pulls are perhaps best understood as components of a cost-benefit analysis – i.e., if the perceived benefit outweighs the perceived cost, the migration will occur.  This does not apply to forced migration, although the concept of “forced” is an elastic one.  Many migrants likely feel forced on some level, but may not meet the requirements for the legal designation.  

Moving is disruptive and expensive; the investment must be worth the anticipated returns.  Ultimately, humans migrate in pursuit of better quality of life, and most do so without knowing exactly what awaits them.

 Pushes

 Pulls

  •  Economic deprivation
  •  Jobs
  •  Unemployment
  •  Higher wages
  •  Low wages
  •  Opportunities for advancement
  •  Family reunification
  •  Welfare benefits
  •  Persecution
  •  Family reunification
  •  Harassment
  •  Community ties
  •  Discrimination
  •  Generous entry and citizenship policies
  •  Fear
  •  Geographic and/or cultural proximity
  •  Threats to life or livelihood
  •  Similar language
  •  Environmental factors
  •  Receptive attitude of native citizens toward immigrants


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Migration may be seen, fundamentally, as a function of economic and demographic inequality in the world.  

  • As long as economic development worldwide remains uneven, migratory pressures will exist.
  • Immigration restrictions do not, in the long run, diminish the overall number of immigrants; such laws simply re-direct determined immigrants toward alternate paths, resulting in increased illegal immigration.  
  • Economic development in LDCs is probably the most effective way to reduce immigration.  The pressures that fuel migration can be mitigated by giving people the incentive to stay where they are.  In other words, as long as wages in the US are 10-15 times higher than those in Mexico and the jobs more plentiful, migrants will want to build a better life over the border, even when the move entails great personal and social costs.  

However, globalization has increased the gap between rich and poor countries (see the Global Poverty and International Development edition of the World Savvy Monitor), and therefore is expected to increase migration pressures (pushes and pulls).

Segmentation of the labor force contributes to migration as well.  Wealthy countries develop a large service delivery industry – e.g., restaurants, landscaping, construction, cleaning, domestic service, etc.  These jobs generate demand for unskilled immigrant labor because they are often undesirable to the native population.

The factors which influence where populations tend to settle tend to be the following:  

  • Geographic proximity is a large factor in the destination of migrants, hence the number of intra-regional migrants – Mediterranean Africans to Europe, Mexicans to America, Chinese to Southeast Asia.   
  • The presence of family or community at the destination is a critical factor, both for primary migrants and obviously for family members who subsequently join them.  Established immigrant communities within societies draw more primary migrants and their families.  These networks are “pulls” that provide economic and social support, cultural familiarity, and even links to employment.  

A study done by the Brookings Institution’s Jill Wilson on Sub-Saharan African migrants to Washington, DC provides a good snapshot of the variety of factors that motivate an immigrant’s choice of destination.  The study identified reasons why immigrants of black African descent, which make up 67% of the area’s refugee population, chose the Washington metropolitan area.  The reasons included the city’s perceived cosmopolitan identity, racial diversity, manageability, relative affordability, large international community, and status as the capital of the country (which, in African nations, is generally associated with privilege and importance).  Once this community became established it was a draw to other African immigrants.  A similar phenomenon can be seen in other seemingly unlikely immigration hubs such as Minneapolis, Minnesota, where a large concentration of Somali and Hmong refugees and immigrants live. 

 

Next:  Migration Basics:  Migration - How?